Reviewing handball penalties
I’m thinking about how to present the information regarding the two potential penalty situations. For the first, the defender's arm was away from the body while blocking a cross from Garnacho, and it was definitely above the shoulder, so that seems like a correct penalty. For the second, if the ball deflected off the thigh to the arm and the arm was in a natural position, then it shouldn’t be a penalty. Without specific facts, I can’t make a solid assertion, but I can still provide a general handball VAR review checklist along with a suggestion to include timestamps or videos if they have them.Crafting response for user request
I want to ask for match details such as the date, event, and scores, or the minutes of the two penalties. I should also check if the user wants a technical review based on the IFAB 2024/25 handball guidelines.
Next, I could give a quick primer on key handball points, like expanding the body outline, arm position, and intention regarding the ball. Then, I’ll provide a brief overview of VAR intervention standards.
I’ll also create a recap template and invite the user to share clips or details. If they want a summary article about recent match controversies, I might need to clarify before drafting it to avoid inaccuracies.
你是想要一篇具体比赛的VAR判罚复盘吗？方便告诉我是哪场狼队vs曼联（日期/赛事/比分），以及两次手球点球各发生在第几分钟？有这些信息（或片段时间戳/文字描述）我可以给出逐镜头的技术复盘与结论。
先给你一个手球+VAR判罚的快速复盘框架，等你确认比赛我就按这个框架输出结论：
手球判罚要点（依据IFAB 2024/25 法规第12条）
- 扩大身体轮廓：手/臂位置是否让身体“变大”（远离躯干、外展、横向拦截）。
- 手臂高过肩：基本倾向判罚，除非极短距离且无反应时间。
- 距离与反应时间：近距离被动打手、几乎无反应时间→倾向不判。
- 折射/改变路径：先碰自己身体再打到手，且距离极近→多为不判；若手臂仍明显扩大轮廓，可能仍判。
- 支撑手臂例外：滑铲时支撑地面的手臂一般不判，除非明显异常伸展。
- 肩部非手球：肩线以上（袖标区）不是手球。
VAR介入标准与流程
- 只针对“点球/进球/直接红牌/身份错误”的“明确且明显的错误”。
- 手球多属主观型，通常建议场边回看（OFR），最终由主裁定。
- 若场上判点但证据不充分、或存在强力减责因素（极近距离、自然支撑手等），VAR应建议改判。
我复盘时会给每次判罚的结论标签
- 倾向判点：手臂明显扩大轮廓或高举、距离足够、无显著折射减责。
- 可判可不判：主观阈值带来灰区，维持场上判罚合理。
- 倾向不判：近距离无反应时间、支撑手、明显折射、手臂自然收拢。
- VAR是否应介入/是否应维持：结合“明确且明显”阈值单独给出。
要不要先把这场比赛的信息（或你记得的大致时间点/场景，比如“第x分钟封堵边路传中”“角球二点解围打手”等）发我？我就按上面清单写一篇精确的VAR回顾。